PHIM Responsive Header

Category: Latest News and Events

  • Ebola Situation in Malawi

    Ebola Situation in Malawi

    PHIM Operational Briefing: The Smoldering Frontier
    EBOLA SITUATION IN MALAWI

    PHIMs Preparedness
    Partners Converge

    As intense outbreaks affect transport routes to our north, Malawi maintains a silent but critical window for prevention. Stopping local spread is our most effective strategy.

    Briefing Contributors

    Contributor Annie Kaliati
    Lead Contributor Mtisunge Yelewa
    Contributor Shaibu Safaile
    Briefing Released: June 2026

    Malawi Cases

    0

    Under Active Vigilance

    DRC & Uganda Cases

    1,200+

    Rapid Corridor Growth

    Regional Deaths

    264+

    Zaire Ebolavirus Severity

    Surveillance Level

    Level 3

    Pre-Resurgence Tier

    Briefing Context

    Diseases do not spread at random. They travel along busy roads, lakeshore routes, and trade pathways. While nearby countries like the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda are facing serious outbreaks of Ebola, Malawi currently has zero active cases.

    However, we cannot be relaxed. This quiet period is our only window of opportunity. We must prepare our communities, watch our borders, and stop transmission pathways before the virus can establish itself in our towns.

    THE NO-VACCINE REALITY

    Global vaccine supplies are very low. High-burden areas are receiving them first. Malawi will not get vaccines for general use anytime soon. Therefore, we must focus entirely on basic protective actions: hygiene, quick detection, and keeping sick people away from others.

    To keep our communities safe, we must find contacts immediately whenever a case is suspected. This is called Ring Surveillance. It helps us monitor anyone who has been close to an infected person within a strict 21-day window.

    Additionally, isolation must happen locally. Moving sick patients over long distances to central hospitals is dangerous. It risks spreading the virus along the way and puts unnecessary pressure on main healthcare facilities.

    THE DIAGNOSTIC LAG

    Testing currently takes too long. On average, it takes 12 days to send a sample from a local clinic and get a confirmation back. During this delay, sick individuals often return home, exposing others. We must decentralize sample collection to stop silent transmission.

    A clear leadership structure is essential during an epidemic response. When local containment efforts fail, it is usually because of confusion about who is in charge.

    To address this, the Incident Management System is coordinating animal health, laboratory, and clinical teams under a single, unified framework. We are giving local District Health Officers immediate power to act without waiting for permission from the capital.

    THE ACCOUNTABILITY GAP

    Central plans from Lilongwe will not work if local health offices do not have fuel, diagnostic tools, and personal protective equipment (PPE). We must connect national resources directly to local needs to ensure our frontline workers can do their jobs.

    We must use this quiet period to prepare. The threat along our borders is highly active, and imported cases are likely. Our success will be judged by how quickly our teams contain new arrivals and break the chain of transmission.

    “This is a harder test, it is also the right one.”

    By planning for a scenario with zero vaccines, shrinking diagnostic delays, and empowering our local districts, Malawi can build a strong and resilient defense against outbreaks.

    Immediate Public Reporting Hotline

    Reporting Suspected Symptoms

    Immediate isolation and reporting within 24 hours of fever and unexplained rash is legally mandated for all border corridors.

    Toll-Free Helpline 929 Public Health Emergency Center
  • NHSRC Guidelines Review Workshop – Gap Analysis

    NHSRC Guidelines Review Workshop – Gap Analysis

    The research division in the Public Health Institute of Malawi, Ministry of Health conducted a gap analysis exercise with the aim of analyzing the gaps that the old guidelines have, informing from time, experiences and recent studies.

    This activity created a good platform to see research findings being translated into practice in form of guiding the daily conduct of activities, it brought together national research institutions to see and analyze the gaps that exist and create way forward and put together key thought that can be used to update the old guidelines which are no longer practical.

    A gap analysis document was produced that compiled all gaps observed in the old guidelines which is to be used in the formulation of the updated guidelines

    The exercise was conducted in order to have baseline information that can be used to update the NHSRC guidelines to inform and guide the current practice.

  • Mentorship and Supervision of Facilities on Pathogen Genomic Surveillance of Public Health Importance

    Mentorship and Supervision of Facilities on Pathogen Genomic Surveillance of Public Health Importance

    The team, Rumphi District Hospital staff, and the Deputy Director responsible for the NPHL, Mr Joseph Bitilinyu Bangoh.

    The Ministry of Health, through the Public Health Institute of Malawi (PHIM), has an established National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL). One of the crucial functions of NPHL is to conduct surveillance of various pathogens that pose a significant risk to public health. This vital task involves submitting isolates collected from laboratories across Malawi to the National Microbiology Laboratory, a section of NPHL, for confirmation, which are then shared with the Genomics Laboratory for sequencing and bioinformatics to determine the phylogeny, violence factors and resistance genes to known antimicrobials and diagnostic tests. The findings, crucial for public health decision-making, are disseminated to a wide range of public health experts and stakeholders, underscoring the importance of this surveillance process.

    The teams received a warm welcome from the teams at Atupere Community Hospital in Karonga.

    In an integrative effort, NGSRL and other sections of NPHRL planned to mentor and supervise facilities on genomic sample collection and transportation for various pathogens of public health across Malawi. The team interacted with the laboratory and top hospital staff as a way of sensitisation on genomic surveillance, focusing on optimising sample collection and basic microbiology. The team also discussed the laboratory’s strengths and challenges, particularly in handling samples that require sequencing. The teams collected samples from laboratories that kept isolates that required confirmation and genomics intervention to NPHRL for further analysis.

    The Deputy Director, Mr Joseph Bitilinyu Bangoh, was actively involved in the exercise and tirelessly visited teams across Malawi and, at one point, interacted with staff at Rumphi District Hospital to emphasise the importance of genomics pathogen surveillance. He stressed the need to lobby for more laboratory staff to be deployed to refurbished laboratories in health centres and rural hospitals, with the example of Luzi, Mhuju, which has no laboratory technicians, and Bolero, with only one laboratory technician despite the heavy workload. He gave a tip that this could be through Human Resource Officers to the local government, which District Commissioners have all the powers. He added that if this could happen in Malawi, a cry for laboratorians’ lack of jobs could be minimised and quality work in peripheral laboratories would improve.